Mustang (S650) EcoBoost vs Mustang (S650) GT
Side A
Side B
Common Comparisons
Select a trim on each side to compare.
TL;DR
Mustang (S650) EcoBoostSmart Money, Pragmatists
Biggest reasons are MSRP (+33%), Configuration (Inline 4), and Aspiration (turbocharged).
Mustang (S650) GTMinimalists, Tourers
Biggest reasons are Displacement (+123%), Power (+54%), and Power-to-Weight (+46%).
| Spec | Ford Mustang (S650) EcoBoost | Ford Mustang (S650) GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model Years | 2024–2026 | 2024–2026 | |
| Release Date | 2023-05-29 | 2023-05-29 | |
| Body Style | coupe / convertible | coupe / convertible | |
| Configuration | Inline 4 | V8 | |
| Displacement | 2.3L (138 ci) | 5.0L (307 ci) | +122.5% |
| Engine Code | 2.3 EcoBoost | Gen-4 Coyote | |
| Crank | cross-plane | cross-plane | |
| Aspiration | turbocharged | naturally aspirated | |
| Fuel | gasoline | gasoline | |
| Redline | 6,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm | +15.4% |
| Power | 315 hp @ 5,500 rpm | 486 hp @ 7,150 rpm | +54.3% |
| Torque | 350 ft·lbs @ 3,000 rpm | 415 ft·lbs @ 4,900 rpm | +18.5% |
| Compression | 9.5:1 | 12.0:1 | +26.3% |
| Bore × Stroke | 87.5 × 94.0 mm | 93.0 × 92.7 mm | |
| Powertrain | ICE | ICE | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | |
| Transmission | automatic 10-speed | manual 6-speed | |
| Curb Weight | 3,660 lbs | 3,874 lbs | +5.8% |
| Power-to-Weight | 190 hp/ton | 277 hp/ton | +45.8% |
| 0–100 km/h | 5.3s | 4.1s | -22.6% |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 162 mph | +4.0% |
| MSRP | $31,920 | $42,495 | +33.1% |
| Fuel Economy | 16 / 24 / 19 mpg | 16 / 24 / 19 mpg |